I’m reading an article on former Poet Laureate Billy Collins, from a newspaper in Norman OK:
“One of the reasons people don’t read as much poetry anymore is the fault of the poets,” he said. “It’s not the public’s fault. There’s an awful lot of bad poetry out there. I’d say about 87 percent of the poetry in America isn’t worth reading.”
It’s the other 13 percent, Collins said, that he lives for. “Poetry should be transparent. Transparent poems tend to teach themselves.”
“Or those poems should say something about the state of the poet and his environment.”
Mr. Collins is probably right, but just a little off the point. The problem is that poetry is being written at all, not just that it’s bad. The problem is that our society is superficial, shallow, impatient, and selfish. Before one can write a poem, it’s necessary to have the artistic impulse that can be expressed in no other way. Is anyone capable of thinking that deeply in the days of Twitter? It’s not fun or easy, gentle reader. Writing is hard work, and poetry takes serious stillness.
Poetry is an art form, the function of which is to reach for the ineffable, that which can’t be reached in any other way. There’s so much bad poetry only because there’s too much poetry. People are try to use art to describe thought which is simply not worthy of art. Transparent or not, speaking to the poet’s state or not, it’s garbage in garbage out.
People want to write poetry because they think they ought to want to write poetry, but they haven’t had the collision with consciousness, or the long dark night of grief, which demands to become a poem. They’ve only had the thought that wants to be a journal entry or a letter to a friend, or a blog entry. That ain’t art.
A poet is first an explorer of his own pain and joy, and an artist with language second. And poetry should be the last resort of the writer. Then if the right words are in the right order, it might be worth reading.
