feeling restored

I got a new desktop computer recently. It’s very cool. It’s so fast I can post this tonight and not even worry about having the idea until a week from Thursday. Anyhoo, once I got my many gigs of goodies safely ensconced on the new machine, it seemed like a good time to reformat my HP dv5000 series laptop, the machine I’m using at this moment. Just wipe the hard drive clean and start over. It’s 3 years old and getting a little gummy and wobbly.

Don’t worry, this has a happy ending. The laptop is all restored, good as new, and running fine. We writers gotta keep our tools in working order, right?

In the good old days, a few years ago, a person who wanted to restore his computer used a disk that came with the machine. You bought the expensive thing, and it came with a genuine Windows disk, with a certificate of sanctity signed by Bill Gates. But computer makers are going cheapass on us, kids. My laptop gave me the option of creating my own restore disks when I first turned it on in 2006. Wow.

On the hard drive, there is also a partition – a special section, set apart from the rest of the computer’s contents – which can be activated to restore Windows XP on the computer. But here’s the problem:

There’s no instruction anywhere on the computer, or anywhere on the HP Web site, or really anywhere on any site on the Internet that a person can trust, that tells us how to use that partition. I even downloaded the technical manual for the laptop from HP, and it’s not mentioned. It has complete diagrams for reducing the beast to a pile of plastic and screws and putting it back together, but no restoration.

So today I put in the disk (there are two DVDs) and started the reformat. It warned me that I was erasing the hard drive, but I forged ahead. Then it told me what you – if you have found this post looking for the information – need to know:

It said this restore is going to make a partition on your hard drive for restoration of your computer to factory condition. If you ever need to use it, press F11 while booting up.

It told me this after the disk had started erasing my hard drive. Too late to go back and use that option. Then the disks took well over an hour – around 90 minutes – to do the job. With the set up business afterwards, it was close to 2 hours.

Sunuffabish. I have to believe that was not the fast way to do it. In fact, I’ve reformatted 2 other computers in the last week for other people – also Windows XP – and it took more like 30 or 45 minutes.

So here’s the poop:

To restore an HP (Hewlett-Packard) dv5000 series laptop (notebook) using the restore partition on the hard drive, press F11 during start-up. … Probably … that’s what it said to do.

Now, the information is googleable on the Internet, permanently. At least, that’s the premise of a blog post. It has a permanlink. (On a blogger blog like this one, the link is the time, at the end of the post, and it’s also the title of the post.) You’re welcome.

Oh, and by the way, my new computer is also an HP, with Windows Vista. It came with no disks at all. Just the partition on the hard drive. Which does not make me feel very secure.

Firefox Ready

“Are you a Firefox user? Apparently, if you are you’re not alone. Sometime this year when I wasn’t paying attention Firefox rocketed to a new high. For over three years I watched as Firefox hovered between a 30–34% browser share. This month I was surprised to see that Firefox consistently exceeds 40% and is preparing to take over IE as the most popular browser.”

Bits from Bill: Firefox Ready to be the #1 Browser.

I like Firefox, and I’ve been using it for quite a while. But it’s rise in competition with Explorer surprises me. I wouldn’t have thought that so many people were going out of their way to download an alternative to the browser that comes bundled with their operating system. Adding an alternative browser isn’t hard to do, but it’s something.

save money, space, and sanity: thoughts on ink and printing

Several months ago, I got a low ink warning from my Canon multifunction printer. So I got some new cartridges and put them in the drawer. There they still sit, waiting for the ink to actually run out.

I don’t do a lot of printing on paper, for many reasons; e.g., it’s expensive, the paper industry pollutes like crazy, it wastes trees, and it wastes space in my place. It clutters my life. We got computers partly so we could stop writing everything down and warehousing it, right? A hard drive or a CD can store thousands upon thousands of documents.

Anyway, I do some printing, but it’s been months, and it’s still printing right along. Every time I click Print, the warning pops up and the printed page comes out. No problem.

Now PC World has published this article which confirms what I’ve long expected: that those ink warnings are often baloney. I guess we all know that printers have gotten cheaper and cheaper over the years because that’s not where they make their money. They make the dough on the ink, which is still pretty expensive.

So my thinking is this: When the warning appears, it’s a nice time to stop by the office store for a new set of cartridges. And when the page rolls out with no ink on it, it’s time to put them in the machine.

And now for something else to read:

The “Please Don’t Print this E-mail” Revolution

Corporate America Rides a Green Wave

Initially popular among a green activists, the “please don’t print this e-mail” signature has become a viral marketing phenomenon. Born in an age of on-the-spot information and quick communication, the socially responsible end-note is gaining popularity in the “cubicle armies of corporate America,” as the Los Angeles Times put it.

The L.A. Times traces the phenomenon’s origin to a 135-word Treehugger blog post that eight months ago asked readers to add this short line to their automatic e-mail signatures: “Save trees. Print Only When Necessary.”

E-mail has yet to produce the fabled “paperless office” that computing power pundits promised (According to GreenPrint Technologies, Americans use enough paper every year to build a 10-foot-high wall that would stretch from New York to Tokyo) but it’s easy enough to trim your paper waistline.

Just add your variation of the following eco-tip to your e-mail signature: “Printing emails is wasteful. Save trees and make this message go viral instead.”

Or, for a simpler call to action, just say: “Please don’t print!”

var isBlog = false; var imageUrl = “”; var path = “/environmental-news/latest/”; var pathArray = new Array(); pathArray = path.split(‘/’); for( i = 1; i ‘); } <!–The signature e-mail tag lines asking people to print only when necessary are becoming common.–> Save Trees: Please don’t print this post.

gmail at 7 gigs

Hey check it out, gmail is 7 gigabytes now. The limit on gmail is constantly increasing, incrementally, day and night. When I first started using it a couple of years ago, it was a little over 2gb. This is very cool.

Just for comparison, remember those little flat floppy discs we used to use? You could store dozens, maybe hundreds, of emails on a floppy. 7gb is something like 6300 floppy discs. When I first started using Web mail, Yahoo gave you 3mb of storage, Hotmail have you 2mb. 1 gb is 1000 mb. And it’s free.

Yahoo mail is unlimited now. Which is great. But the features just aren’t there, like conversations that keep sent mail and incoming mail together, and labels. Labels let you organization mail by multiple topics or people, instead of deciding on just one folder to put them in.

I’m using 16% of my limit, and I have about 12,000 conversations stored. Some conversations have several e-mails, so that’s a whole lot of e-mails, kids. Plus I often store large photos and videos in my gmail account.

You can use gmail with almost any email account – like Cox, verizon, even Yahoo. And it’s much better than messing with a downloading software like Outlook or Outlook Express, in my opinion.

So I guess I’m sayin, I really like gmail.


gmail.com

Yahoo and AOL? egads

“SAN FRANCISCO — Internet pioneers Yahoo Inc. and AOL were closing in on a deal late Wednesday that would combine their businesses into an online advertising giant, according to four people familiar with the talks.

If consummated, the deal could let Yahoo wriggle out of a situation that this week had seemed inevitable: succumbing to Microsoft Corp.’s unsolicited $42-billion takeover bid.”[Los Angeles Times]

Oh, the horror! The horror!

Yahoo was my way out of the blight that was AOL. It was my lifeboat, when AOL became becalmed in a vast and chewy sea of dial-up Content. Now Yahoo has been blown into the horse latitudes too, and I’ve moved on to using Google as my Internet sloop. But it’s hard to see my old vessel from Silicon Valley go down by the bow; worse yet, to be towed out by this giant sluggish freighter.

Too much Metaphor? Sorry.

from the "I’ll believe it when I see it" file…

As part of a plan to reinvigorate its brand, Starbucks will offer free wireless Internet access at more than 7,000 stores. This spring, customers who use Starbucks cards can get up to two hours per day of free Wi-Fi, while customers of AT&T Broadband and U-Verse services will have unlimited access in Starbucks stores. Others can purchase two hour increments for $3.99 – much cheaper than the existing T-Mobile service.

Future Tense commentator Dwight Silverman says this expansion of free Wi-Fi is good news for mobile workers, but bad news for independent coffee shops.

So reports John Gordon on American Public Media.

A few thoughts:

  • Very little, pretty late, to make me fall in love with Starbucks. They’ve been yanking their customers’ chains with their locked wi-fi for a long time, and it should be 100% free and unlimited to everyone who buys coffee.
  • Two hours a day is stingy; unless, like me, that’s more than enough time to have the old ample posterior parked in a coffeehouse.
  • $2 an hour is simply a rip-off. Is the dark liquid property of their product the only thing Starbucks has in common with Exxon Mobile? Apparently not.
  • It’s not bad news for independent coffeehouses which are able to do two things: make better coffee than Starbucks and provide totally free wi-fi. That should be very easy to do.

beware the spellcheck loophole!

Look at the title of the post two posts down from this. It says wrtiers and producers. WTF?

You need to know – and tell a bloggy friend – if you’re using Firefox and rely on its wonderful running spellchecker, that it doesn’t work in Blogger title fields. It will let you hose a post, and presumably somebody at Mozilla is laughing at you, not with you.

I’m kidding, it’s cool. It’s worth it; so much less Terminator than Microsoft Exploder.

Cloud

“We speak of life as an oboe
speaks, in Summer colors
stirring the orchards
playing the windchimes by the door.”

[Link]

Hey, look what I learned how to do.

I learned how to make a Web page in MS Publisher, a program I didn’t know I had until I stumbled across it i my Start menu today. More importantly, I learned how to use Windows Explorer to open and upload to an FTP site. This is just a simple little sample test page, with a poem I wrote a long time ago. I still have a lot to learn about the program’s features.

I’ve used Front Page and Dreamweaver before (I’ll let you google them), but I don’t have them anymore, and have no inclination to buy such expensive software right now. So for a long time, I’ve been using Yahoo’s Pagebuilder, since my site is hosted by Melborn via Geocities, which long ago was bought out by Yahoo.

Well, Pagebuilder simply sucks; it’s nothing. Complaints to Yahoo, shaming them for not updating a Web app that dates to the latter part of the last century, fall on indolent ears.

Publisher is included with my copy of MS Office. So now I can create Web pages in Publisher, upload via FTP, and I’m good as gold. I rock. (Golf applause please.)

hello world!

My sitemeter says Metaphor has recently had visits from The Netherlands and Saskatoon Saskatchewan, way up north in Canada. Wow. Welcome.

It reminds me of the 70s, when we had a massive CB radio station, and an antenna on the roof that was larger than the house itself. We would talk to each other by skipping and squelching and exchange CQ Cards – custom designed postcards – via snail mail.

The equivalent of the CQ Card today is, of course, the much sought after but elusive Comment. Which, like voting, should be done early and often.